CROPfm Forum

Mitch Battros von Earth Changes Media, den Dieter Broers erst vor wenigen Tagen erwähnt hat, bittet in seinem Newsletter ausdrücklich um die Weitergabe dieser äußerst wichtigen Information an alle erreichbaren News-Gruppen und Communities:

March 12, 2010
Earth Changes Media
with Mitch Battros

Part V – The Law of Scientific Cycles and Coming Events

by Mitch Battros – Earth Changes Media

This may be the most important article I have ever written. It will be the last, and longest, report in this series. The importance of you understanding what is now unfolding is matchless. I will go so far as to say: “I will promise you, that what you are about to read, will be in world headlines for the next ten years.”

It will begin with a smattering of breaking scientific news, grabbing the attention of those who are familiar with geo and astro-sciences, and ruffling the feathers of those more religiously oriented. However, within the next 18 months, it will be front-page news.

I strongly encourage you to send this report to every single news group or community to which you belong. Yes, it is that important. The rapidly filled puzzle between ancient text and current science has reached its apex.

Before we go into the scientific factual data and its implications of Earth’s position in this current cycle, I would like to address some very important questions which clarify the foundation of this report.

First let me state in clear terms — There is no evidence whatsoever suggesting the current cycle we are in reflects the over-the-top sensationalism produced by Hollywood. No … the world is not coming to an end, killing every living person, place or thing. However, it is true that we will see an escalation in earth-changing events. This is not a time to panic, but simply prepare for rapid shifts geologically and personally. This is best done by having an ‘awake’ knowledge of events and research as well as a basic preparedness plan.

I currently live and work in Seattle, Washington. There are few places more prone to earth-changing events such as earthquakes, volcanoes, and tsunami’s than Seattle. I say this for two reasons. 1) Even if I have all the knowledge and preparedness resources one can image; if my family is at the epicenter of an event, my ability to utilize such resources could be extremely limited, if not fatal. 2) Before I start to receive hundreds of emails asking me “where is the safest place to live?” — I will tell you there might not be any such place. My answer to you is — it is better to select the “who” not the “where.” This is to say; I believe it far more important to surround yourself in a supportive and perhaps like-minded community. This would more likely increase your ability to minimize the effects of any potential threat.

It was when I was taken to task “live” on television by my guest Will Carey, a geologist and permaculturist, was the moment that changed my perspective. He brought into the studio a map of the United States. With it, he brought several sketched transparences. He then one by one, placed a transparence over a section of the US highlighting the danger of that area. By the time he was finished, the entire map was covered. If it is not an earthquake, it is a volcano, or a tornado (which kills more people than any other disaster – by this statistic could change-), or a hurricane, or a flood, or an ice or snowstorm. Will covered every State from California to New York — the message was clear.

There are a few basic questions which must be answered to give perspective which outlines a cycle. 1) Are there currently more earthquakes, volcanoes, tornadoes and other extreme weather events occurring in recent months? The answer is yes. There has been an up-tick in natural phenomena which covers most areas of earth-changing events i.e. earthquakes, volcanoes etc. 2) Are they larger? The answer is yes. In this portion of time within the current cycle, earth-changing events have demonstrated an up-tick in ferocity. 3) Are we at a time in this cycle which suggests an increase in numbers and intensity? The answer is yes.

Long-term scientific studies of long-term cycles all have the same answer. What is happening now and coming events in the months and years ahead, have happened many-many times before. Every historical science echo’s the same results. — Yes, all of them. — Palaeo-biology – study of fossil Plants and animals; Palaeo-climatology – study of ancient climates; Palaeo-limnology – study of ancient lakes; Palaeo-ntology – study of fossils; Palaeo-pedology – study of early soils; Paleo-botany – study of ancient plants; Paleo-isotopic – study of charged particles; Paleo-ecology – study of past ecosystems; Paleo-ntology – study of prehistoric life and evolution; Palynofacies – study of organic matter such as sedimentary rocks; Palynology – study of fossil pollen and spores.

Now to the question of Why and How?
The connection between ancient text, especially Mayan text and prophecy, and current scientific research is astounding. Mayan text speaks of coming earth changes that have already begun, and will increase over the next few years. In this lays the answer of ‘Why’ and ‘How’.

The answer to ‘why’ is simple. It is nothing more than a “cycle”. One the Earth has seen many times before, and will see many times ahead. To answer the “how” is a bit more complex. Perhaps this should be broken down into two parts. The “how” related to the accuracy of Mayan text and prophecy; and the ‘how’ of the actual events and their source.

One quick note to my more religious patrons. I speak with full authority as a baptized Catholic, Confirmation recipient, first Communion, Alter-boy, and seven-year parochial student. With such credentials, I wish to remind those who may be more conservative of their religious beliefs, it was Pope John Paul II who stated clearly, and to the shock and awe of my parents and Catholic’s around the world, “creation and evolution can co-exist.”

On October 22nd 1996, Pope John Paul II addressed the Pontifical Academy of Sciences in Rome, reiterating the Catholic view that the human body evolved according to natural processes, but God specially infuses the soul which like other spiritual phenomena, cannot arise from material causes. He added that the evidence for evolution has increased greatly since Pius XII’s Humani Generis, emphasizing the convergence of independent lines of evidence pointing to the same conclusion provides considerable support for evolution. Pope Paul II says: “Evolution is more than a hypothesis; it is a well-accepted theory of science.”



The answer to the ‘how’ of Mayan accuracy is my personal theory. Since I have not received one shred of serious evidence suggesting some type of alien intervention (although I would love to see some produced), the only other reason for such empirical knowledge by Mayan ancestry is to suggest the Mayan culture is far older than anyone has suggested. Perhaps in alignment with other tribes when continents were still connected, a chain of information was exchanged from Mesoamerica to Mediterranean and all indigenous tribes between. This would include all the Native American tribes of North America and Canada.

Is it possible the Mayan ancestry is not 4,000 years old, maybe not even 10,000 years old, but 50,000 years old? Although even at 10,000 years such as the Egyptians, would certainly be enough time to advance the observation of ‘cycles’ within this period. Remember — there are cycles within cycles. On the short end of the scale would be our solar cycle with an approximate 11 year span. There is the Maunder cycle suggesting a 200 year cyclical span. Then there is the Milankovitch cycles showing climate swings every 20,000, 40,000 and 100,000 years.

Important: All cycles mentioned are related to the Sun and out-of-solar system celestial cycles.

Straight to the point: My research is stating Mayan text especially, but also Aztecs, Hopi, Dogon, Egyptian, Tibetan, Celtic, Druid among others including the Bible itself — all speak in one harmonious voice — “There is a beginning, a middle, and an end within lifecycles. During the time of change (specifically addressing the time we are in now), there will be hardship and awakening — the source will come from the sky.” Today’s latest scientific celestial and geo-physical discoveries are saying “the exact same thing”.

Following is the language of science addressing the latest discoveries and what it means. In short, it is the influence of celestial charged particles and its interaction with Earth’s core which is the cause of earth-changing events as outlined above. No; we are not all going to die or witness the extreme fantasy of Hollywood, but ancient text clearly says: “life will be different.”
___________________

New Mysterious Stream of Charged Particles Found

Distant galaxy clusters mysteriously stream at a million miles per hour along a path roughly centered on the southern constellations Centaurus and Hydra. A new study led by Alexander Kashlinsky at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., tracks this collective motion — dubbed the “dark flow” — to twice the distance originally reported. “This is not something we set out to find, but we cannot make it go away,” Kashlinsky said.

The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra. Kashlinsky says: “We detect motion along this axis, but right now our data cannot state as strongly as we’d like whether the clusters are heading towards Earth or away, or both.■


_________________

Dark Object nicknamed ‘Nemesis’ May Be Kicking Asteroids Towards Earth

A dark object may be lurking near our solar system, occasionally kicking comets in our direction. Nicknamed “Nemesis” or “The Death Star,” this undetected object could be a red or brown dwarf star, or an even darker presence several times the mass of Jupiter.
New discoveries have scientists thinking something could be hidden beyond the edge of our solar system? Originally, Nemesis was suggested as a way to explain a cycle of mass extinctions on Earth.

A recently-discovered dwarf planet, named Sedna, has an extra-long and usual elliptical orbit around the Sun. Mike Brown of Caltech, noted in a Discover magazine article that Sedna’s location doesn’t make sense. “Sedna shouldn’t be there,” said Brown. “There’s no way to put Sedna where it is. It never comes close enough to be affected by the Sun, but it never goes far enough away from the Sun to be affected by other stars.”